-= HDD SPEED TEST =-

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:32 pm

-Un simplu test de viteza,..folositi urmatorul soft: http://www.snapfiles.com/download/dlrkdisk.html

Afisati rezultatele dupa exemplul de mai jos:

HDD folosit:WD 40GB

Linear Read:

-Mb's Read - 219.2500
-Elapsed Time - 5.001
-Speed - 43.8377

Random Read:

-Mb's Read - 13.7188
-Elapsed Time - 5.006
-Speed - 2.7403

Access Time:

-Accesses - 510
-Elapsed Time - 5.007
-Access Time - 9.82

Overall Score: - 4567

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:47 pm

daca ar merge si linku am testa

Red Baron · Post by **Red Baron** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:26 pm

Link corect E un punct in link-ul de mai sus

HDD 80 GB Maxtor SATA

Linear Read:

-Mb's Read - 280.5000
-Elapsed Time - 5.002
-Speed - 56.0804

Random Read:

-Mb's Read - 13.5938
-Elapsed Time - 5.014
-Speed - 2.7112

Access Time:

-Accesses - 494
-Elapsed Time - 5.006
-Access Time - 10.13

Overall Score: - 5633

RAYNOR · Post by **RAYNOR** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:22 pm

HDD Samsung 80GB ATA 133, 8MB.

Linear Read:

-Mb's Read - 279.5000 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.002 sec.
-Speed - 55.8809 MB/s

Random Read:

-Mb's Read - 15.4688 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.013 sec
-Speed - 3.0858 MB/sec

Access Time:

-Accesses - 564
-Elapsed Time - 5.006
-Access Time - 8.88 ms

Overall Score: - 6408

Later edit 6639

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:12 pm

HDD Maxtor 80 gb 2mb

Linear Read:

-Mb's Read - 240.0625 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.001 sec.
-Speed - 48.0050 MB/s

Random Read:

-Mb's Read - 14.1875 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.002 sec
-Speed - 2.8362 MB/sec

Access Time:

-Accesses - 512
-Elapsed Time - 5.006
-Access Time - 9.78 ms

Overall Score: - 5012

OC · Post by OC » Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:18 pm

6481
wdc1200jb de 2 ani juma vechime

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:11 pm

...sorry era un punct in plus la link...

Necrosero · Post by **Necrosero** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:21 pm

4718 pe un Maxtor IDE de 60 de giga, care are 2 ani vechime... O sa fac testul si pe celalalt calc, care are un SATA, cand o sa am timp...

Marmota · Post by **Marmota** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:51 pm

Unu din hddurile din system

Linear Read
MB's Read 287.2500 MBs
Elapsed Time 5.000 Seconds
Speed 57.4498 MB/Sec

Random Read
MB's Read 18.3125MBs
Elapsed Time 5.001 Seconds
Speed 3.6617 MB/Sec

Accesses Time
Accesses 698
Elapsed Time 5.005 Seconds
Access Time 7.17 ms

Overall Score 8152

PSS 214 · Post by **PSS 214** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:38 pm

ce hdd ai MARMOTA ca ai scos un scor frumos =D>

io am un WesternDigital 80gb JB 8mb 7200rpm IDE ATA100

Linear Read
MB's Read 280.6875 MBs
Elapsed Time 5.000 Seconds
Speed 56.1337 MB/Sec

Random Read
MB's Read 15.9063 MBs
Elapsed Time 5.004 Seconds
Speed 3.1787 MB/Sec

Accesses Time
Accesses 578
Elapsed Time 5.007 Seconds
Access Time 8.66 ms

Overall Score 6595

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:37 pm

HDD Western Digital 320Gb

Linear Read:

-Mb's Read - 314.1250 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.001 sec.
-Speed - 62.8147 MB/s

Random Read:

-Mb's Read - 15.9375 MBs
-Elapsed Time - 5.000 sec
-Speed - 3.1872 MB/sec

Access Time:

-Accesses - 579
-Elapsed Time - 5.006
-Access Time - 8.65 ms

Overall Score: - 7381

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:38 pm

e "lucrat" scoru lu marmota va zic eu

mark`` · Post by **mark``** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:23 am

5186 pe un HDD WD 80 Gb 7200rpm si 8 Mb buffer! Deocamdata!

5252 the new score and rising!

mark`` · Post by **mark``** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:27 am

PSS, cum se face ca ai scor mai mare la hard 6595, iar eu am mai putin 5252, in conditiile in care am exact acelasi hard ca al tau?

RAYNOR · Post by **RAYNOR** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:45 am

mark`` wrote:PSS, cum se face ca ai scor mai mare la hard 6595, iar eu am mai putin 5252, in conditiile in care am exact acelasi hard ca al tau?

Probabil mai trebuie defragmentat. Incearca un test fara si unul dupa ce i-ai dat defrag..

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:51 am

probabil hardu meu e nou....si probabil daca citesti reviewuri de harduri iti vei da seama ca aceeasi firma /7200 si 8mb buffer nu inseamna aceleasi performantze...mai sunt si alte variabile

Marmota · Post by **Marmota** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:41 pm

PSS wrote:ce hdd ai MARMOTA ca ai scos un scor frumos =D>

dai click pe system la mine si vezi.....sunt 2 Hitachi 7K250 la 160GB 8Mb buffer pe Sata (no raid)

noobinlove wrote:e "lucrat" scoru lu marmota va zic eu

clar, ca numai de asta am eu timp. plus de ce l-as "lucra" ? ca sa ma laud ca am hdd beton sau ce...oricum stiu ca sunt cele mai performante

asa ca nu vad rostu

PS. te roate individia?

VooDoo3 · Post by **VooDoo3** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:13 pm

Sigur e bun testu ?

Am un excelsor imprumutat
Scoate cam mult 7800...

[/img]

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:45 pm

..da e bun,...

Marmota · Post by **Marmota** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:51 pm

VooDoo3 wrote:Sigur e bun testu ?
Am un excelsor imprumutat
Scoate cam mult 7800...

Pai nu te mai mira

ma surprinde ca nu au intrecut Hitacki...excelsor sunt divizie a Hitachi/IBM, dar am impresia ca este divizia de teste etc. oricum e mecanica hitachi

taurled · Post by **taurled** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:04 pm

WD 80GB, 8MB

in functie de partitie intre 4200-5200 (scorul)

PSS 214 · Post by **PSS 214** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:06 pm

e cam idiot testu... scuzati-mi expresia dar... daca il faceti de 3-4 ori la intervale scurte scoate alt scor... de ex. azi a scos 5600 apoi 6500 iar apoi 6653... aiurea... propun sa gasim alt programel pt testarea HDD-ului

na si dovada... acu am scos si mai mult... am facut testu pana am scos 6653

ice01 · Post by **ice01** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:06 pm

Frumos background .. stiu

, uite si rezultatele
Seagate S-ATA 7200rpm/80Gb

Samsung P-ATA 7200rpm/40Gb

Have fan !
Rezultatele sunt comice si controversate, daca faci testul in mod repetat intradevar da alte scoruri, si oricum cand am vazut acel EXCELSTORE inaintea la alte hdd-uri dovedit mai rapide ma umfla rasul. Nu vreau sa se simta nimeni prost, dar mai incete ca acele hdd-uri nu mi-a fost dat sa vad, mai ales la copiere ... in fine ...

Marmota · Post by **Marmota** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:15 pm

ice01 eu cred ca tu vroiai sa ne arati backgroundu

cat despre exceltor io nu prea stiu nimic...si pe mine ma surprins scoru ...dar stiam ca au ceva leg cu aia de la ibm/hitachi (cum am mai scris) si m-am gandit ca cine stie.....dar eu unu n-am pus mana pe nici unu si sincer nu as pune mana

Predator864 · Post by **Predator864** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:22 pm

Scor 6546
Hdd Maxtor 6L80M0 (80gb)
Sata NCQ Diamond Max 10 (non raid -ca am 2)

PSS 214 · Post by **PSS 214** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:26 pm

taurled wrote:WD 80GB, 8MB

in functie de partitie intre 4200-5200 (scorul)

cam mic scoru... e pe ata33 sau 66 sau ce ?? sau e in PIO ?

VooDoo3 · Post by **VooDoo3** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:50 pm

ice01 poti zice ce vrei , hddul nu e al meu

dar adevarul ca a scos cam mult.. de aia ma intrebam daca e bun testul + ca daca-l faci de mai multe ori creste rezultatul

ps: cred ca-mi iau excelstor in loc de maxtor

)

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:24 pm

...da e bun Testul,..am mai testat cu mai multe programe si la toate difera rezultatul de la un test la altul,...adevaru-i ca HDD nu are o viteza constanta de scriere si citire,...doar ca diferentele sunt foarte mici,...nu-l poti seta sa scrie sau sa citeasca cu o anumita viteza intr-un anumit interval...

...mai ar fi o modalitate sa te convingi ca aceasta aplicatie chiar testeaza HDD,...pune urechea pe carcasa cand ai pornit testul,..nu stiu la altii cum e dar la mine caraie mai rau ca de obicei (ful load jocuri/aplicatii grele).

...nu recomand repetarea testul de "N" ori pe zi,...nu raspund de cele intamplate in caz contrar,..o singura data e suficient,..max 3 ori,...

PSS 214 · Post by **PSS 214** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:56 pm

ul,..nu stiu la altii cum e dar la mine caraie mai rau ca de obicei (ful load jocuri/aplicatii grele).

la WesternDigital nu merge... nici nu-l aud in full load

noobinlove · Post by **noobinlove** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:47 pm

nici eu

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 9:31 pm

...si al meu e tot W.D. uita-te la "System",...doar ca e IDE si are 3 ani vechime,.

abrash · Post by **abrash** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:38 am

Uite am testat si eu la mine pe WD1200JS cum sta treaba

Necrosero · Post by **Necrosero** » Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:31 am

Pe celalalt calc, care are un Seagate SATA 2 am scos 6950...

AsAsIn8eR · Post by **AsAsIn8eR** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:07 pm

Iata si rezultatul meu cu Maxtorul din [System] pe partitia cu windowsul am obtinut:6221 iar pe cealalta cu filme/muzica&co. am obtinut un scor mai mic.Atasez si un screenshot pentru unbelievers:).HDD-ul e pe PATA/40Gb/2Mb/7200RPM il am de vreo 6 luni:)).Caraie ca dreq(doar e facut in mother CHINA):

jedrus · Post by **jedrus** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:57 pm

Ia uitati la scorul meu !
HDD WD Raptor 74 GB

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:38 pm

jedrus wrote:Ia uitati la scorul meu !
HDD WD Raptor 74 GB

20202!!! =D>

...si zicea cineva ca nu ar fi bun testul,...frumos HDD,...aproape ca si un SCSI

,...il folosesti la server nu!?

Marmota · Post by **Marmota** » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:41 pm

si parca raptor era pe sata nu scsi

Alante · Post by **Alante** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:12 am

...stiu ca e S-ATA,...dar are performante apropiate de SCSI la asta m-am referit,...m-am corectat acum e bine

.

jedrus · Post by **jedrus** » Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:15 am

De fapt am omis sa spun ca sunt 2 HDD WD intr-o matrice RAID 0.
Chiar si asa cred ca scorul este unul bun.
PS. Nu il folosesc la server.

adinoshu · Post by **adinoshu** » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:50 pm

10872
RAID 0 2x80GB Seagate 7200.7 7200 RPM\8M - pe un Sillicon Image
Cred ca pe ICH5 obtin mai bine...[/b]